Health & Medicinearticle2026-10-12

Disease Duration Differentiates Freezing of Gait Response to Subthalamic and Nigral Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease in an Exploratory Multicenter Controlled Trial

Open access0 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Freezing of gait (FoG) belongs to most pressing unmet symptoms in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. OBJECTIVES: To explore whether combined subthalamic and nigral (STN + SNr) deep brain stimulation improves FoG compared with optimized STN stimulation alone; to identify clinical variables associated with therapeutic response. METHODS: In this exploratory multicenter randomized controlled double-blind trial, we recruited patients from our existing cohorts and randomized them 1:1 to STN or STN + SNr. After baseline, patients were followed with close interim visits (visits 1-5) for 90 days (visit 6). The Freezing of Gait Assessment Course (FoG-AC) was the primary endpoint and was evaluated at P < 0.2 with exploratory intent. Secondary endpoints assessed responder rates, treatment dynamics, predictors of response, and patient preferences. RESULTS: At V6, STN (n = 23) and STN + SNr (n = 22) FoG-AC outcomes did not differ significantly. We identified responders with clinically meaningful FoG improvement in both the STN (n = 7) and STN + SNr (n = 8) groups. In STN + SNr responders, mean disease duration was ~12 years, which was ~4.5 years shorter than in non-responders, but there were no differences in motor and cognitive functions. Treatment dynamics suggested that FoG responders improved slowly and gradually. The STN + SNr responder group showed numerically stronger FoG improvement compared with STN responders. Additionally, 15 STN compared to 10 STN + SNr patients wished to change treatment after the RCT phase and before unblinding. Both STN and STN + SNr treatment was safe. CONCLUSIONS: Future trials evaluating adjunctive STN + SNr stimulation should stratify patients by disease duration to optimize outcomes.

// Source

View paper (DOI)Open access versionOpenAlexMovement Disorders Clinical PracticePublished 2026-10-12

Authors: Daniel Weiß, Idil Cebi, Marion Schütt, Imma Fischer, Lukas Pavelka, Pierre Kolber, Monika Pötter‐Nerger, Wolfgang Hamel, Andrea A. Kühn, Christian Johannes Hartmann, Kai Bötzel, Thomas Koeglsperger, Michael T. Barbe, Zacharias Kohl, Steffen Paschen, Markus A. Hobert, Sergiu Groppa, Tobias Warnecke, Inga Claus, Rejko Krüger, Alireza Gharabaghi

Institutions: Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, University Hospital Cologne, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, University Hospital Münster, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, University of Tübingen, University of Regensburg, University of Münster, Universität Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, University of Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen, LMU Klinikum, Zimmer Biomet (Netherlands), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Luxembourg, Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, Institute for Integrative and Experimental Genomics, Klinikum Osnabrück, International Neuromodulation Society, Deutsches Zentrum für Psychische Gesundheit