Health & Medicinearticle2026-08-27

Real-world outcomes of second-line therapy in advanced thymic carcinoma: a multicenter Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study

Open access0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with limited evidence guiding second-line treatment after prior systemic therapy. We evaluated real-world outcomes of second-line systemic therapy in a multicenter cohort. Methods Adults with unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic TC who received second-line systemic therapy after prior systemic therapy between 2010 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Treatments were categorized as multidrug chemotherapy, gemcitabine monotherapy, PD-1 inhibitor therapy, or targeted therapy (sunitinib). For the primary comparison of multidrug chemotherapy versus gemcitabine monotherapy, propensity scores based on age, sex, ECOG performance status, Masaoka–Koga stage IV, prior surgery, and calendar year were used to generate overlap weights. Weighted Cox models used robust standard errors clustered by treatment center. A sensitivity propensity-score model additionally included first-line carboplatin–paclitaxel exposure (yes/no). Results A total of 107 patients from 20 treatment centers were included. Median age was 53.2 years (IQR, 41.5–58.0), 78 (72.9%) were male, 81 of 106 patients with available data (76.4%) had ECOG 0–1, and 61 (57.0%) had Masaoka–Koga stage IV disease at diagnosis. At a median follow-up of 35 months, median PFS and OS for the overall cohort were 13.6 and 35.0 months, respectively. In the primary overlap-weighted comparison ( n = 89), multidrug chemotherapy was associated with a lower hazard of progression or death than gemcitabine monotherapy (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.14–0.59; p < 0.001) and a lower hazard of death (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18–0.97; p = 0.043). In a sensitivity model additionally incorporating first-line carboplatin–paclitaxel exposure, the PFS estimate remained significant (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16–0.65; p = 0.0015), whereas the OS estimate remained directionally similar but was less precise (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.19–1.11; p = 0.083). The PD-1 inhibitor group ( n = 13) had median PFS and OS of 15.0 and 48.0 months, respectively, in unadjusted descriptive analyses. Conclusions In this retrospective cohort, multidrug chemotherapy was associated with lower hazards of progression or death and of death than gemcitabine monotherapy in the primary overlap-weighted analysis. A sensitivity analysis additionally accounting for first-line carboplatin–paclitaxel exposure preserved the PFS association and yielded a similar but less precise OS estimate. Outcomes observed with PD-1 inhibitors were favorable but should be interpreted descriptively because of the small sample size, later treatment era, and potential residual confounding. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require prospective validation.

// Source

View paper (DOI)Open access versionOpenAlexBMC CancerPublished 2026-08-27

Authors: Fatih Kuş, Fatih Atalah, Gökhan Şahin, Caner Kapar, Damla Günenç, Erkut Demırcıler, Alper Topal, Halil Göksel Güzel, Yakup Düzköprü, Mert Erciyestepe, Ilgın Koç Kuş, Ömer Denizhan Tatar, Fırat Şirvan, Gözde Ağdaş, Bilgesah Kilictas, Irem Ugurlu, Abdüssamet Çelebi, Goncagül Akdağ, Doğan Bayram, Ayşegül Merç Çetinkaya, İlknur Deliktaş Onur, Taliha Guclu, Omer Faruk Elcicek, Şendağ Yaslıkaya, Elif Sahin, Pinar Gursoy, Öztürk Ateş, Abdullah Sakin, Harun Muglu, Murad Guliyev, Nigar Rustamova Cennet, Melike Özçelik, Melek Karakurt Eryılmaz, Ahmet Bilici, Nebi Serkan Demirci, Mehmet Ali Şendur, Saadettin Kılıçkap, Derya Kıvrak Salim, Ozlem Er, Gamze Gokoz Dogu, Serdar Karakaya, Hasan Çağrı Yıldırım, Mustafa Erman

Institutions: Memorial Ankara Hospital, Pamukkale University, Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Ankara Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Hacettepe University, Gazi University, Akdeniz University Hospital, Marmara University, Dr Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ege University, Istanbul University, Antalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Bahçeşehir University, Acıbadem University, Bilkent University, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Cukurova University, Necmettin Erbakan University, Ankara Onkoloji Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ümraniye Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Gülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi, Bakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul Eye Hospital, Antalya IVF, Dokuz Eylül University, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Liv Hospital, Hacettepe University Hospital