Survival and Extent of Breast Surgery in Patients with Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis from the EUSOMA Database
Abstract
ABSTRACTBackground: The optimal management of breast cancer (BC) patients with pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains debated. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate whether the extent of surgery influences survival outcomes in this patient population.Materials and Methods: Using the EUSOMA database, we retrospectively collected data of women with pCR after NAT, excluding those with BRCA1/2 mutations. The cohort was stratified by surgery type, i.e. breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using Cox regression.Results: Of 467 patients, 327 (70%) underwent BCS and 140 (30%) mastectomy. Women treated with mastectomy were more likely to have multifocal tumors and advanced disease. After a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 7.3% of patients experienced BC recurrence. Axillary nodal involvement (cN+) and mastectomy were independently associated with recurrence, occurring in 11.4% of cN+ compared to 3.7% of cN0 patients (HR 3.02; 95% CI: 1.40-6.51; p=0.005), and in 12.5% of mastectomy vs 5.2% of BCS patients (HR 2.08; 95% CI: 1.05-4.11; p 0.035). cN+ patients also showed significantly higher mortality rates (9.4% vs 1.6% of cN0; HR 6.16; 95%CI: 2.09-18.17; p= 0.001). However, surgery type did not impact OS.Conclusion: In this large cohort of BC patients with pCR after NAT, mastectomy was associated with a higher risk of recurrence compared with BCS. Baseline nodal involvement independently predicted recurrence and mortality; however, the type of surgery did not impact OS. These findings support BCS as a safe treatment option for this patient population.
// Source
Authors: Federica Martorana, Damiano Gentile, Mariano Tomatis, Antonio Ponti, Lorenza Marotti, cynthia aristei, Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti, Kwok‐Leung Cheung, Olaf Johan Hartmann-Johnsen, Isabel Teresa Rubio, Donatella Santini, Francesco Sardanelli, Elżbieta Senkus, Peter A. van Dam, Giuseppe Curigliano, Giuseppe Catanuto, on behalf of the EUSOMA Working
Institutions: University of Nottingham, University of Bologna, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Humanitas University, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, University of Milan, European Institute of Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Catania, University of Perugia, Royal Marsden Hospital, Akershus University Hospital, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk Medical University, University Clinical Centre, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, Piedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention, Royal Derby Hospital, Lega Italiana per la Lotta ai Tumori