Climate & Environmentarticle2026-10-08

Land use intensification results in abrupt transitions between extensively and intensively managed grasslands

Open access0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Understanding whether land use intensification causes regime shifts (i.e. persistent, large changes in ecosystem states) is of key importance for management, particularly if these shifts occur abruptly as thresholds in land use intensity are crossed. Further, these threshold responses can show hysteretic dynamics, where the transition between states cannot simply be undone by reducing land use intensity to its initial level, and instead larger changes are required. However, quantitative evidence for threshold responses and their dynamics remain scarce. Here we use a unique, long‐term grassland database in Germany to identify threshold responses to land use intensity. We include data on the response of 16 ecosystem functions (including plant biomass, herbivory, litter decomposition, pathogen infection, water recharge, C and N fluxes and retention and enzymatic activity) and the diversity of 21 taxa (including above‐ground and below‐ground taxa such as vascular plants, lichens, bryophytes, arthropods, vertebrates, fungi, protists and bacteria). Then, we use increased variance as an early warning signal to evaluate if threshold responses are indicative of critical transitions between states. Finally, we use temporal data to identify hysteretic dynamics associated with those transitions. We show that 5 out of 10 above‐ground taxa, fungal diversity, shoot biomass and soil N retention showed threshold responses to land use intensity, that is abrupt changes between extensively and intensively managed grasslands. Some of the thresholds were associated with increased variance in the response variables, suggesting a potential critical transition between ecosystem states. Time‐series analysis indicated that ecosystem functions showed a hysteretic response to land use intensity, but diversity measures did not. Our results suggest threshold responses to land use intensity are relatively common in the grasslands we studied. These thresholds show abrupt changes in the ecosystem when highly diverse extensively managed grasslands are managed slightly more intensively. Further, shifting back to the functioning seen in extensively managed grasslands may be challenging, as it requires larger reductions in land use intensity than those required to shift to the high intensity state. Identifying thresholds along land use gradients is critical to prevent ecosystem degradation and conserve biodiversity and ecosystem functions in semi‐natural grasslands. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

// Source

View paper (DOI)Open access versionOpenAlexFunctional EcologyPublished 2026-10-08

Authors: Hugo Sáiz, Lena Neuenkamp, Caterina Penone, Klaus Birkhofer, Nico Blüthgen, Steffen Boch, Michael Bonkowski, François Buscot, María R. Felipe‐Lucia, Anna Maria Fiore‐Donno, Markus Fischer, Martin Freitag, Óscar Godoy, Kezia Goldmann, Martin M. Goßner, Ute Hamer, Norbert Hölzel, Kirsten Jung, Ellen Kandeler, Valentin H. Klaus, Till Kleinebecker, Sophia Leimer, Sven Marhan, Yvonne Oelmann, Jörg Overmann, Daniel Prati, Swen C. Renner, Matthias C. Rillig, Sebastian Seibold, Michael Schloter, Ingo Schoening, Johannes Sikorski, Stephanie A. Socher, Emily F. Solly, Ingolf Steffan‐Dewenter, Barbara Stempfhuber, Catrin Westphal, Wolfgang Wilcke, Tesfaye Wubet, Susanne Wurst, Eric Allan

Institutions: Universidad de Cádiz, University of Cologne, University of Göttingen, Universidad de Zaragoza, University of Tübingen, University of Würzburg, University of Bern, University of Münster, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Freie Universität Berlin, ETH Zurich, Technical University of Munich, Ruhr University Bochum, University of Duisburg-Essen, University of Salzburg, Universität Ulm, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Helmholtz Munich, Natural History Museum Vienna, University of Hohenheim, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research, Leibniz Institute DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Berlin Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems