Big data and psychiatry: advances, constraints and future directions.

Abstract

Early work in psychiatry research, often involving single sites, small samples, and limited variables, has shifted to contemporary research involving multiple sites, large samples, and many variables. Such research raises important questions, including concerns about data quality and methodological rigor, uncertainty about its key lessons, issues regarding clinical relevance, and questions about how to optimize future advances. Here we consider these questions and concerns against the context of big data work on community and register-based surveys, cohort and biobank studies, electronic health records, digital phenotyping, brain imaging, genomics and other -omics, and randomized controlled trials. The development of large datasets allowing well-powered analyses is a major milestone, but sample size alone does not guarantee more precise estimates, and ongoing attention to the quality and rigor of big data collation and analysis is needed. Big data research has fostered trans-disciplinarity and given insights into mechanisms underlying psychiatric disorders, but also emphasizes the intricacy, heterogeneity and variability of such mechanisms, and the importance of triangulating between large-scale and small-scale research. The complexity of psychiatric phenotypes and psychobiological mechanisms contributes to the difficulty in bridging from big data to clinical application; big data research reinforces the importance of holding our diagnoses of psychiatric disorders lightly and providing explanations of these conditions humbly; and future work needs to be more attentive to clinical issues. There is enormous scope for further building databases relevant to psychiatry, but advances in conceptual models and asking the right questions are equally valuable. The full impact of big data, including artificial intelligence analyses, remains to be seen, but overenthusiastic support should be tempered by a better understanding of its strengths and limitations. At its best, such work will contribute in an iterative and integrative way to advancing our knowledge of psychiatric disorders and mental health.