Health & Medicinearticle2026-09-18

Contribution of Adolescent Movement Behaviours to Socioeconomic Inequalities in Adult Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Causal Decomposition in a Population-Based Cohort

Open access0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Addressing unhealthy movement behaviours in adolescence could reduce socioeconomic inequalities in adult cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Among 6608 adolescents enrolled in the Add Health cohort (1994-1995) and followed into adulthood (2016-2018), movement behaviours (physical activity, screen time, sleep) were classified as healthy or unhealthy based on adherence to the 24-Hour Movement Guidelines. Parental education and family financial hardship captured socioeconomic position (SEP). The outcome was 30-year CVD risk in adulthood. G-formula-based causal decomposition quantified changes in socioeconomic inequalities under two interventional scenarios: (1) eliminating unhealthy movement behaviours across the population, (2) equalizing the low-SEP group’s movement behaviour distributions to match the high-SEP group. Adolescents whose parents did not graduate from college/university had a higher adult CVD risk than those whose parents did (RD: 6.9%, RR: 1.73). Eliminating all unhealthy movement behaviours reduced the RD to 4.9% (-2.0% absolute change), while the RR remained similar (1.76). Eliminating unhealthy levels of physical activity produced the largest absolute reduction (-1.7%), with negligible reductions for screen time (-0.2%) and sleep (-0.2%). The equalization scenario had minimal impact, and results were similar for family financial hardship. Whole-population interventions targeting unhealthy adolescent movement behaviours, particularly physical activity, may reduce absolute socioeconomic inequalities in adult CVD risk.

// Source

View paper (DOI)Open access versionOpenAlexAmerican Journal of EpidemiologyPublished 2026-09-18

Authors: Nicholas Grubic, Katerina Maximova, Arnaud Chioléro, Arjumand Siddiqi, Sarah Carsley, Brice Batomen, Cristian Carmeli

Institutions: Harvard University, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, McGill University Health Centre, Public Health Ontario, St. Michael's Hospital, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Fribourg, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Institute of Population and Public Health, Health Solutions (Sweden), St Michael’s Hospital, Swiss School of Public Health