Alessio Montaruli

Imperium–Actus Complex — Execution Records and Errata Supplement (Reading Programme V1.2; V14 Amendment Blueprint V1.1; Chapter 17 Scholion Commission V1.1; Errata and Binding Controls of 9 August 2026)

The public execution chain of the Arrival Declaration V1.10 deposit, completed on external review of the same date: the executing instruments named in the Integration Ruling (the Volume III V14 Amendment Blueprint, the Chapter 17 scholion commission, the reading programme) in the...

Arrival Declaration — The Imperium–Actus Hypothesis (V1.10), with the Integration Ruling and Amendment Pass of 9 August 2026

A dated public record of a hypothesis complex (the Imperium–Actus Hypothesis, H-arrival-0/1/2/3, Hinges A′/A, H-sun) that arrived outside the registered sacred-economic sample during the drafting of Ethical Ontology, Volume II, on 9 August 2026; its non-opening under the deposite...

Imperium–Actus Routed Trial — Exposure-and-Holdout Register V1, with the Validated Governance Rules (Proposal V2) and Corrected Instruments (Reading Programme V1.3; V14 Amendment Blueprint V1.2)

The evidential-independence instrument of the routed Imperium–Actus trial: every formation-period exposure identified at source–passage–claim-family level and classified E2/E1/E0 under the validated three-tier rules (E2 discovery, provenance grade, non-scored; E1 coupled, full de...

Imperium–Actus Complex — Execution Records and Errata Supplement (Reading Programme V1.2; V14 Amendment Blueprint V1.1; Chapter 17 Scholion Commission V1.1; Errata and Binding Controls of 9 August 2026)

The public execution chain of the Arrival Declaration V1.10 deposit, completed on external review of the same date: the executing instruments named in the Integration Ruling (the Volume III V14 Amendment Blueprint, the Chapter 17 scholion commission, the reading programme) in the...

Arrival Declaration — The Imperium–Actus Hypothesis (V1.10), with the Integration Ruling and Amendment Pass of 9 August 2026

A dated public record of a hypothesis complex (the Imperium–Actus Hypothesis, H-arrival-0/1/2/3, Hinges A′/A, H-sun) that arrived outside the registered sacred-economic sample during the drafting of Ethical Ontology, Volume II, on 9 August 2026; its non-opening under the deposite...

The Three Differences and the Phenomenology of the Lateral Difference

A working note distinguishing three differences — ontological (what obtains / how it obtains), categorial (how / how), and lateral (this own / another own) — and developing the phenomenology of the third. It is deposited as the candidate articulation of a preregistered identity t...

The Three Differences and the Phenomenology of the Lateral Difference

A working note distinguishing three differences — ontological (what obtains / how it obtains), categorial (how / how), and lateral (this own / another own) — and developing the phenomenology of the third. It is deposited as the candidate articulation of a preregistered identity t...

Preregistration of the Lateral-Difference Identity Trial

Conditions fixed in advance for an identity trial on a determination of the corpus's own working doctrine. The candidate distinguishes this own obtaining from another own obtaining within the same who-region where both obtain the same repeatable manner. It is compared against thr...

Preregistration of the Lateral-Difference Identity Trial II: a full-text comparison against seven prior articulations

Conditions fixed in advance for a second identity trial on the lateral difference. The first trial (10.5281/zenodo.21827989) is closed and every verdict it returned stands; this trial exists because its instrument carried two defects its own closure note prints. The candidate as...

Building an Instrument by Running It: Seventeen Results for Ontosystematics from Two Reflexive Identity Trials

Ontosystematics proposes a comparative inquiry into the identity and difference of determinations concerning being. No instrument existed for performing such a comparison so that it could come out either way. This record accounts for two reflexive identity trials run to build one...

Preregistration of the Lateral-Difference Identity Trial

Conditions fixed in advance for an identity trial on a determination of the corpus's own working doctrine. The candidate distinguishes this own obtaining from another own obtaining within the same who-region where both obtain the same repeatable manner. It is compared against thr...

Institute Research Agenda V1.2

opened at Institute launch V. 1.2: Adds Programme H (Title-Location Atlas).

Ontological Pluralism Without Degrees of Being

Contemporary ontological pluralism is largely conducted within a shared quantifier-first settlement in which being is rendered as existence and ontological structure through fundamental quantification. Turner shows that multiple fundamental quantifiers need not collapse under the...

Preregistration of a Reflexive Node-Classification Trial in Ontosystematics: positive no-ground across two articulations

Conditions fixed in advance for the reflexive node-classification trial of the Ontosystematics founding article. The candidate is the determination that the common constitutes what acts without answering for it and that what remains when the ground-function is refused is a positi...

Ontosystematics — Gate Dossier: priority search, performed audits, and validation, August 2026

Working instruments of the Ontosystematics founding article: the G1 object- and regional-priority assessments of Heidegger, Schürmann, Gilson, Badiou, and the Tier-2 candidates; the stopping rule with its candidate tiers, saturation condition, and reopening triggers; the performe...

Ontosystematics: Foundations of a Systematic Science of Ontological Nodes

Ontosystematics is the positive conceptual science of ontological nodes: their identity, composition, difference, inheritance, migration, transformation, and recombination across the habitats that host them. Its founding distinction separates a habitat — any historically occurrin...

Preregistration of the Categorial-Gap Trial: the modal coincidence between Positive No-Ground and Ethical Ontology, Volume I

Conditions fixed in advance for a trial of the corpus's own novelty claim. Positive No-Ground determines the common as possibilising necessitation and the locus of answerability as singularising necessarisation; Ethical Ontology, Volume I determines the who as their modal coincid...

Canon Self-Test of Montaruli's Razor: four tests, three acquittals and one conviction

The governing canon of Ontosystematics tried under the four tests fixed against it: tribunal of standing, stopping rule, self-application, and periphery. The test was conducted against the practice recorded in the series ledger and the two completed classifications rather than ag...

Ethical Ontology, Volume II — Episode Registries, Parts II–VI, V1.1

Part-level episode registries for Ethical Ontology, Volume II, executed under Out-of-Sample Trial Preregistration V1.1 (10.5281/zenodo.21744060), which registers the trial protocol and requires that the historical sample be fixed in advance of any verdict. The sample was publicly...

Preregistration of a Reflexive Node-Classification Trial in Ontosystematics: positive no-ground across two articulations

Conditions fixed in advance for the reflexive node-classification trial of the Ontosystematics founding article. The candidate is the determination that the common constitutes what acts without answering for it and that what remains when the ground-function is refused is a positi...