Preregistration of a Reflexive Node-Classification Trial in Ontosystematics: positive no-ground across two articulations

Abstract

Conditions fixed in advance for the reflexive node-classification trial of the Ontosystematics founding article. The candidate is the determination that the common constitutes what acts without answering for it and that what remains when the ground-function is refused is a positive structure rather than a lack. It is tested across two articulations of one corpus under maximally different carriers and warrants: enacted in narrative and dialogical exhibition, and stated as doctrinal proposition. Five outputs with convicting conditions fixed in advance — adjudicated identity, division, failed identity, suspension, and carrier-bound — with the cost of each printed. Contamination controls are strict because author and classifier coincide. Publication is unconditional on outcome. Deposited before any classification is performed under it. Version 1.1 adds the completed classification report. The trial was performed under the conditions deposited in version 1.0 and returned divided candidate: Koinonia establishes constitution without absolution and stops at the floor, while the refusal of the ground-office and the positive standing of what remains are added in No Ground, so the two clauses of the candidate are separately identifiable and do not travel together. The later synthesis in Positive No-Ground is that book's achievement and does not retroactively unify them. Carrier-boundness, failed identity, and suspension were tested and do not obtain. Publication is unconditional on outcome, and the verdict falls against the corpus's own founding determination.