Health & Medicinearticle2026-10-06

Biventricular vs conduction system pacing after atrioventricular node ablation for heart failure with atrial fibrillation: the CONDUCT-AF trial.

0 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Randomized evidence comparing conduction system pacing (CSP) and biventricular pacing (BVP) following atrioventricular node ablation in patients with refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) remains limited. This study evaluated whether CSP with left bundle branch area pacing is non-inferior to BVP in patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation. METHODS: CONDUCT-AF was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomized trial conducted across 10 European centres. Patients with refractory AF, HF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, narrow QRS duration (≤120 ms), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide > 600 ng/L were randomized 1:1 to CSP or BVP. The primary endpoint was the change in LVEF after 6 months, assessed by an independent core laboratory. Secondary endpoints included echocardiographic, clinical, and procedural outcomes. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were randomized (mean age 72 ± 7 years, 46% male). At 6 months, LVEF improved similarly in CSP {from 36% [95% confidence interval (CI) 33-39] to 46% [95% CI 44-49]; P < .001} and BVP group [from 34% (95% CI 31-36) to 46% (95% CI 43-49); P < .001]. The between-group difference was .4% (95% CI -3.1-3.8; P = .002 for non-inferiority). Changes in left ventricular volumes, clinical parameters, and composite endpoint of worsening HF or cardiovascular death were comparable between groups. Paced QRS [mean difference -14 ms (95% CI -19 to -9; P < .001)] and procedural and fluoroscopy times were significantly shorter with CSP compared with BVP. CONCLUSIONS: In HF patients with refractory AF undergoing atrioventricular node ablation, CSP with left bundle branch area pacing was non-inferior to BVP for LVEF improvement at 6 months, providing comparable clinical outcomes and a favourable procedural profile.

// Source

View paper (DOI)OpenAlexPubMedPublished 2026-10-06

Authors: David Žižek, Maja Ivanovski, Miha Mrak, Cătălin Pestrea, Ecaterina Cicală, Sandro Brusich, Ivana Grgić Romić, Péter Bógyi, Gábor Zoltán Duray, Sebastiaan Dhont, VASSIL BORISLAVOV TRAYKOV, Josip Kedžo, Matevž Jan, Miroslav Krpan, Luka Klemen, Bor Antolič, Jakob Peterlin, Tadej Žlahtič, Tomaž Podlesnikar, Wilfried Müllens, Anja Zupan Mežnar

Institutions: Semmelweis University, Institute for Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Hasselt University, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, University of Rijeka, University of Split, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, University Clinical Centre Maribor, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Klinički Bolnički Centar Split, Klinički Bolnički Centar Rijeka, Tokuda Hospital, Acibadem City Clinic