A study of 167 autistic children in Belgium found only partial overlap between structural language skills, the amount of speech children produced and how meaningfully varied that speech was. Some children who spoke little had relatively strong language abilities, while some who spoke often had limited structural skills and produced less varied language.

The findings suggest that describing autistic children simply as verbal or non-speaking can miss important differences. Assessing language skills, speech output and generative language separately may provide a fuller picture of each child’s abilities.