Public perceptions of polygenic testing and embryo selection for non-medical traits
Abstract
Abstract Some advances in reproductive technologies raise substantial ethical and psychological challenges, for example, the use of preimplantation genetic testing to select embryos based on non-medical traits. While studies have explored public willingness to use preimplantation genetic testing for medical or non-medical attributes, stated willingness may not reflect implantation decisions when such information is available. This large cross-national study examined public views on polygenic embryo testing. In a US sample ( N = 1,467), participants were more willing to test for medical conditions (for example, heart disease) than non-medical traits (for example, antisocial behaviour or low intelligence), although over half supported testing for non-medical traits. In a forced-choice implantation task, participants used medical and non-medical information to a similar extent when making decisions. Similar patterns were observed in Chinese participants ( N = 623). These findings suggest variability in choices across specific traits and conditions, rather than a uniform distinction between medical conditions and non-medical traits. The Stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 7 October 2025. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://osf.io/vb9c2 .
// Source
Authors: Edmond Awad, Clara Colombatto, Joanna Demaree-Cotton, Brian D. Earp, Jim AC Everett, Peng Liu, Owen Schaefer, Ilina Singh, Dominic Wilkinson, Julian Savulescu
Institutions: University of Exeter, University of Oxford, Zhejiang University, National University of Singapore, University of Waterloo, University of Kent, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, John Radcliffe Hospital