In the study, participants made monetary sharing decisions that differed in cues about the partner (distressed, neutral, or unidentifiable). While making these choices, they intermittently reported what they were thinking using a multidimensional experience sampling approach, allowing researchers to track thought states moment by moment.
The researchers reduced the reports to a small number of common, interpretable thought patterns. These patterns changed with social context and tracked individual differences in generosity and model-based measures tied to fairness preferences. The same thought patterns also appeared in a separate non-social task, suggesting they reflect general cognition rather than only task-specific effects.



