Engineering & Technologyarticle2026-08-27

The AWAKEN wind farm benchmark – Part 2: Modeling results

Open access0 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Accurately modeling wind farm performance in complex atmospheric flows remains a challenge. This paper presents the modeling results of the American WAKE experimeNt (AWAKEN) wind farm benchmark, a collaborative effort involving 16 research groups from academia and industry within the International Energy Agency Wind Technology Collaboration Programme Task 57. The study evaluates a diverse suite of simulation tools, ranging from fast-running engineering wake models to high-fidelity large-eddy simulations, against a diurnal case study observed during the AWAKEN campaign. The benchmark utilized a three-phase structure to progressively assess model performance as observational data availability increased. Initial blind predictions showed that higher-fidelity models did not uniformly outperform simpler simulation tools. A distinct spatial bias was observed where models struggled to resolve the interplay between a low-level jet, wakes, and terrain-induced flow acceleration. In subsequent phases, leveraging additional measurements for model improvement led to a reduction in mean absolute error across the model ensemble; however, this effect was most pronounced in engineering wake models, where targeted calibration reduced error by up to 40 %. Overall, the study demonstrates that inflow characterization remains a primary prerequisite for accuracy, particularly for models relying on coarse forcing datasets. While the limited ability to resolve local terrain-flow interactions under single-day conditions represent a recognized constraint, the overall findings on wake modeling and real-world validation still provide valuable guidance for model application and for mitigating this limitation.

// Source

View paper (DOI)Open access versionOpenAlexWind energy sciencePublished 2026-08-27

Authors: Nicola Bodini, Patrick Moriarty, Regis Thedin, Paula Doubrawa, Cristina L. Archer, Myra Blaylock, Carlo L. Bottasso, Bruno Carmo, Lawrence Cheung, Camille Dubreuil, Rogier Floors, Thomas Herges, Daniel Houck, Ali Kanjari, Colleen Kaul, Christopher Kelley, Ru LI, Julie K. Lundquist, Desirae Major, Anh Kiet Nguyen, Mike Optis, Luan R. C. Parada, Alfredo Peña, Julian Quick, David Ricarte, William Corrêa Radünz, Raj K. Rai, Oscar García-Santiago, Jonas Schulte, Knut S. Seim, P. van der Laan, Kisorthman Vimalakanthan, Adam Wise

Institutions: Johns Hopkins University, Universidade de São Paulo, Technical University of Denmark, University of Colorado Boulder, University of California, Berkeley, Technical University of Munich, University of Delaware, National Laboratory of the Rockies, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Météo-France, Sandia National Laboratories, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Sandia National Laboratories California, Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy Systems, Equinor (Norway), North Island College