Requests from institutions, short sellers and anonymous users carried different information about companies’ future returns.
The study examines whether requests for SEC records contain useful information about publicly traded companies and whether sophisticated investors act on it. The researchers find that the signals differ by requester: requests from proxy agents seeking information about ongoing investigations and anonymous requesters are associated with lower future returns, while requests from institutional investors and intellectual property entities are associated with higher future returns.
The analysis also supports the direct-trading hypothesis: institutional investors and short sellers trade on information obtained through FOIA requests. The findings point to requester identity as an important part of interpreting what an SEC information request may signal.
Evidence and caveats
This is an empirical journal study based on an analysis of SEC FOIA requests, their requester types and future stock returns, along with trading by institutional investors and short sellers. The abstract reports correlations and evidence consistent with direct trading, but it does not establish that the requests themselves cause later returns or trading decisions. It also does not provide the sample size, study period, effect sizes or details needed to assess how broadly the results apply.
// Source
Review of Accounting Studies · 2026 · DOI: 10.1007/s11142-026-09988-7
Authors: Dichu Bao, Janja Brendel, Michael S. Drake, Lixin Su
Institutions: Chinese University of Hong Kong, Brigham Young University