A life-cycle assessment of a pumped-hydro storage facility modeled three scenarios involving wind power, grid electricity, hydropower, storage and electricity demand. Compared with a baseline without pumped-hydro storage, the scenarios with storage produced 81% fewer greenhouse-gas emissions and lower levels of other assessed environmental impacts.

The storage infrastructure also created environmental burdens, especially through the production of the steel and cement needed to build it. The analysis was based on simulated flows for an existing European Alpine facility and covered impacts from construction through the end of the system’s life.