The study assessed how different technologies and strategies could reduce aviation’s climate impacts through 2050. Sustainable aviation fuels offered the quickest reductions because they can work with existing aircraft and fuel systems, while hydrogen had greater long-term potential but required new aircraft designs, clean hydrogen production and major infrastructure changes.

Electric propulsion provided the strongest near-term benefits for short routes but remained difficult to apply to longer flights because of battery limits. A combined pathway using sustainable fuels, electrification and hydrogen performed better overall than individual options. The researchers also modelled continued use of Jet A1 fuel alongside large-scale carbon offsetting as a lower-disruption alternative.