Researchers systematically evaluated AlphaFold3 on proteins that lack a single stable shape, both individually and in assemblies. For individual proteins, AlphaFold3’s confidence scores were a reliable guide to disorder and performed similarly to AlphaFold2 and dedicated disorder predictors.

For assemblies, AlphaFold3 had aggregate docking performance similar to AlphaFold2, but the two systems appeared to achieve those results differently. AlphaFold3 also often produced substantially different results from independent runs, with occasional strong predictions among otherwise weaker ones. Both systems performed equally well on cases where disordered proteins fold when they interact, predicting the final folded states.