Developing and validating a learning design framework to support inquiry in under-resourced science classes

Abstract

This study aimed to examine how design strategies used by science communicators in informal learning environments (ILEs) could be adapted to develop a framework that supports scientific inquiry in under-resourced science classes. Using the analytic induction research strategy, a multiple-case study was conducted involving science communicators from three ILEs: National Science Museum (Thailand), Sci-Bono Discovery Centre (South Africa), and Tūhura Otago Museum (New Zealand). The Delphi technique was then used to validate the findings. Findings from the cases were reconciled with the literature from both formal and informal science education to develop a new inquiry learning design framework. The new framework, referred to as the Complementarity of Learning Framework (Colfram), consists of four simplified inquiry stages that are strengthened by design strategies from informal science learning environments. The Colfram is proposed as a design tool to assist teachers operating in under-resourced settings to develop their own inquiry learning materials. By combining the strengths of both formal and informal science learning viewpoints, we argue that the Colfram can better support teachers to develop material that achieves the broader goals of inquiry learning, which include cultivating STEM identities and sustained interest in science.