The Impact of Video Game Experience on Surgical Performance: A Systematic Review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether video gaming experience is associated with improved surgical performance in the surgeon population across laparoscopic, robotic, and other surgical modalities, and evaluate its implications on surgical training and education. METHODS: A structured literature search was conducted across five databases on 29th November 2024 in adherence to PRISMA guidelines. Comparative studies evaluating surgical performance outcome data between surgeons with differing video game experience were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes evaluated were time to complete task, error rate, accuracy, economy of motion, and overall score. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias using ROBINS-I and RoB 2. RESULTS: 15 studies involving 641 participants were included, comprising one randomized controlled trial and 14 nonrandomized studies. All nonrandomized studies were judged to be at moderate or serious risk of bias, and the single randomized controlled trial was judged to be at serious risk of bias. Differences in study design and outcome measures meant that quantitative synthesis could not be performed. Across laparoscopic studies, video gaming experience was associated with improved overall score and time to task completion predominantly in the period prior to structured training interventions, with accuracy findings consistently favoring gamers in the two studies reporting this outcome. Error rate and economy of motion findings were inconsistent or predominantly nonsignificant. No meaningful association was identified across nonlaparoscopic modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Video gaming may be associated with improved surgical performance in surgeons, though this appears restricted to laparoscopic tasks and the pretraining intervention period. As a low-cost and accessible activity, video gaming may represent a practical informal adjunct to formal surgical training to help ease the transition into structured technical training. Surgical program directors need not alter existing selection criteria or training modules based on the available literature.