Review examines brain and psychological effects after non-fatal strangulation
The authors found reported cognitive, emotional, and physical problems, but noted limited long-term evidence and inconsistent assessment methods.
Moderate evidenceReviewInterpret with caution
Medical disclaimer: This article summarizes research findings and is for informational purposes only. It is not medical advice.
Editorial illustration — not from the study.
Researchers combined findings from 26 peer-reviewed articles about non-fatal strangulation linked to intimate partner violence and possible acquired brain injury. The review focused on neurological, psychological, and physical effects, as well as implications for health care and policy.
Across the literature, the authors reported cognitive, emotional, and physical problems among people affected by this form of violence. They also found that recognition and management were inconsistent, while long-term outcomes and standardized assessment approaches remained insufficiently studied.
What the review covered
The researchers conducted an integrative review using searches of eight databases. They included 26 peer-reviewed articles addressing non-fatal strangulation in intimate partner violence, its possible link with acquired brain injury, neurological and psychological effects, and implications for health professionals, policy, and clinical practice. The abstract does not specify the participants' combined sample size or the designs and quality of each included study.
What the evidence shows
The reviewed literature reported that non-fatal strangulation-acquired brain injury may be associated with cognitive, emotional, and physical impairments. The review also identified frequent gaps in recognition, inconsistent screening and management strategies, and a lack of validated tools and standardized protocols. These findings summarize patterns in prior research; they do not show that every survivor will develop these problems or establish the cause of any individual person's symptoms.
Who this is relevant to
The findings may be relevant to people who have experienced non-fatal strangulation in the context of intimate partner violence, particularly those represented in the 26 included articles. They should not be assumed to apply equally to all survivors or to establish the effects for any one individual.
The significance
The review draws attention to a possible but often overlooked connection between non-fatal strangulation and later neurological, psychological, and physical difficulties. It suggests that inconsistent recognition and limited long-term evidence are important gaps for health systems and research. These are implications of a synthesis of existing studies, not proof that a specific screening or management approach improves outcomes.
Limitations & evidence assessment
The review included 26 articles, but the abstract does not report the number or characteristics of people represented across those studies, the designs of the individual studies, or their risk of bias. Long-term outcomes were described as understudied, and screening and management approaches were inconsistent. Because this was a review of existing research rather than a new patient study, it cannot establish the effects for any particular person or determine cause and effect from the summary alone. The review also had no patient or public contribution.
Why this evidence level: This was an integrative review of 26 peer-reviewed articles, which provides a broad summary of existing research. However, the abstract does not describe the quality of the included studies, their individual designs, or how consistently the findings were measured, so the evidence is not classified as high.
Evidence levels are editorial estimates derived from study metadata — they are not clinical appraisals.
This review analyzed human studies comparing two treatments given before surgery for locally advanced esophageal or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: FLOT chemotherapy and CROSS chemoradiotherapy. The pooled estimate favored FLOT for overall survival, but the groups had similar three-year survival, tumor response, surgical margins, and several major perioperative outcomes.
A systematic review examined whether Passiflora edulis, commonly known as passion fruit, is linked with lower blood pressure. It included six preclinical studies and two human trials; the animal and laboratory findings were generally more extensive than the human evidence. The authors reported possible blood-pressure reductions but emphasized that the human studies were small, varied in the extracts used, and short in duration.
Researchers studied 96 people with high-risk, locally advanced rectal cancer in a single-center phase II clinical trial. The treatment combined chemotherapy, short-course radiation, and a targeted drug selected for each study cohort. Overall, 40% had a complete response, but the study did not establish how this approach compares with other treatments.
