A review finds that inherited changes in plant DNA methylation are real in some settings but often short-lived and difficult to generalize.
The review examines whether heat, drought, salt and pathogen exposure can leave heritable marks in plants. It focuses on DNA methylation, especially RNA-directed DNA methylation, a plant pathway in which small RNA molecules help add methyl groups to DNA and alter gene activity.
The authors compare maize paramutation at the b1 locus with stress-related methylation reported in clonal dandelions. They conclude that sequence-independent inheritance is mechanistically established in particular genomic contexts, but that many other reported changes fade quickly or may be confused with parental provisioning and other effects.
Where stress marks persist
The review concludes that plant epigenetic inheritance is neither an established general rule nor an illusion. In specific cases, molecular marks can persist through cell divisions and, at some loci such as maize b1, through meiosis. The review identifies RNA-directed DNA methylation as a plausible route by which stress-linked small RNAs can install new DNA methylation, while maintenance pathways involving MET1 and chromomethylases can help preserve methylation.
The dandelion examples show that ordinary environmental stresses can alter methylation patterns that partly persist in unstressed offspring and are accompanied by measurable phenotypic effects. Across the broader Arabidopsis and rice literature discussed in the review, however, most induced changes are described as short-lived and reset within one or two generations. The authors distinguish three questions: whether a mark is inherited, whether it benefits the offspring, and whether the pattern is widespread. They find strong evidence for inheritance in some settings, mixed evidence for benefit, and weak evidence for generality.
Evidence and caveats
This is a review of published research, not a new experiment. Its strongest examples come from particular systems: maize paramutation and clonal dandelions. The dandelion system reproduces without meiosis or fertilization, bypassing much of the resetting that occurs in sexually reproducing plants; the review therefore treats its transmission rates as an upper bound rather than a typical value.
The authors also note that stress-related methylation can be confused with parental provisioning or incomplete resetting during reproduction. Results vary by species, genetic background, genomic location and environment. Because most induced changes in the broader Arabidopsis and rice literature are short-lived, findings from clonal dandelions cannot simply be extended to outcrossing or self-fertilizing plants, including most major seed crops.
// Source
PROTOPLASMA · 2026 · DOI: 10.1007/s00709-026-02272-0
Authors: Gurjant Singh
Institutions: Montclair State University