Anti-Kremlin Telegram channels kept dissent visible through key war phases

A study of 114 channels found that discussion and audience reactions shifted with military, political and economic events.

Editorial illustration — not from the study.

Researchers examined 354,819 posts from 114 anti-Kremlin Telegram channels published between January 2022 and March 2023. They divided the conflict into seven phases and combined automated topic analysis with close reading of posts and measures of posting activity and viewer emoji reactions.

Five recurring topics dominated the channels: Russian domestic affairs, the economy, international politics, Ukrainian domestic affairs, and combat and frontline updates. The balance changed over time: economic discussion was concentrated early on, while combat and international politics returned to prominence as military and diplomatic events shifted. Posts about Russian domestic affairs drew strong engagement during periods involving mobilization, annexation and opposition-related issues.

How the channels changed

The channels sustained visible discussion of politically sensitive issues across seven phases of the conflict, while both posting activity and viewer reactions varied over time. Economy-related posts were most prominent in the early phases and then declined. Combat and international politics repeatedly became more prominent alongside changing military and diplomatic developments. Russian domestic affairs attracted strong audience engagement during mobilization, annexation and opposition-related periods. Across the five themes, changes in channel activity and viewer emoji reactions occurred at the same time as major offline developments.

Why Telegram mattered

The findings indicate that Telegram provided a countervailing communication space for anti-Kremlin dissent while independent political expression faced severe restrictions offline. They also show that audiences engaged with different subjects as the conflict and Russia’s political circumstances changed, rather than responding uniformly throughout the period studied.

Evidence and caveats

The study analyzed a large collection of posts from 114 channels over roughly 15 months, using computational topic modeling, qualitative thematic analysis, event-based time periods, and measures of posting activity and viewer emoji reactions. Its results show temporal correspondence, not that offline events caused particular topics or reactions. The analysis covers selected anti-Kremlin Telegram channels and this period only, so it does not establish how all Telegram users, other platforms or later phases of the conflict behaved. The abstract also does not report the numerical results of the planned statistical contrasts.

Why people compete matters for careers, well-being and gender differences

Competitiveness is not one single motivation, according to a study using data from a Dutch survey panel. People who enjoy competition and those driven to win both tend to have better professional outcomes, but they differ in well-being and personality traits.

4 hours ago·3 views

Society & Economics

U.S. banks’ exposure to climate-policy shifts may be 0.5% to 14%

A study of U.S. banks estimates that climate-transition risks could affect between 0.5% and 14% of loan portfolios, depending on the assumptions used. The estimates are based on climate-policy scenarios and detailed loan data rather than carbon emissions alone.

1 day ago·11 views

Society & Economics

A humanoid robot decides when to speak up—and when to hold back

Researchers have developed ProAct, an AI system that lets a physical humanoid robot respond in real time while also deciding when to initiate social interaction. Demonstrations included approaching a passerby, correcting a misunderstanding with a gesture and re-engaging someone distracted by a smartphone.

1 day ago·15 views