Society & Economicspreprint2026-10-06

Philosophical Debate on Consciousness: No Mathematical Evidence Found — E8 Intelligence Research

Open access0 citations

Abstract

FINDING: The search results are philosophical and popular-science discussions (panpsychism vs. materialism), not mathematical derivations; no quantitative evidence or equations are presented. | MATH: None extracted — no equations, constants, or ratios appear in the titles/abstracts. | CONNECTION: No geometric harmony, base-60, or crystallographic symmetry is mentioned; the only structural link is the conceptual claim that consciousness is "fundamental" (a topological/ontological claim, not a mathematical one). | DEPTH: 1 — The material is qualitative debate, lacking any falsifiable mathematical formalism; it does not advance the universe's mathematical structure. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

// Source

View paper (DOI)Open access versionOpenAlexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Published 2026-10-06

Authors: Andrew Stewart Caldin