Verumika: Ontological Dichotomy of Justice and Proof of the Justice of the World Order

Abstract

This article presents a formal proof of the justice of the world order based on the ontological dichotomy of justice and injustice. Justice is defined as the exact correspondence of recompense to deed (V = D). It is argued that justice is ontologically unstable: any violation generates an irreversible cascade that reaches its limit in eternity. From this, an ontological dichotomy follows: the world is either completely just or completely unjust. The universality of antiverumism in science is demonstrated through an analysis of scientific theories, including Everett's many-worlds interpretation, and an experimental confirmation through a survey of physicists is proposed. It is then demonstrated that universal antiverumism is possible only in a just world, thereby closing the proof. A testable prediction is proposed: increasing the personal honesty of scientists to a 50/50 level should lead to a shift from an antiverumistic worldview to a verumistic one.