Birds of a Feather: A Multidisciplinary Review of Neural, Evolutionary, and Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Similarity-Based Interpersonal Attraction
Abstract
People tend to befriend and marry people who resemble them. The finding is old and well replicated, but its explanations are scattered: social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, behavioral genetics and computational social science have each built their own account and rarely cite one another. This narrative review brings them together around three questions: which mechanisms link similarity to attraction, when the effect weakens or reverses, and how digital platforms change who meets whom. A meta-analysis of 313 studies found a correlation of r = .47 between actual similarity and attraction, but the effect was largest when participants rated a stranger they never met, and it was not significant in existing relationships. Perceived similarity (r = .39) predicted attraction at every relationship stage. Partners resemble each other strongly in political values (r = .58), religiosity (r = .56) and education (r = .55), and weakly in the Big Five (r = .08 to .21). In three national samples totaling 23,250 married people, personality similarity explained about 0.5% of the variance in satisfaction beyond each partner's own traits. In a prospective fMRI study of 41 MBA students scanned within days of arrival, neural response similarity predicted who were friends eight months later. Friends show excess genome-wide similarity of roughly fourth-cousin size, although population stratification may explain much of it. An agent-based model shows that assortative mating can arise from heritable variation in traits and preferences, with no dedicated mechanism for detecting similarity. The evidence supports a multilevel framework with four levels: genetic substrate, neural alignment, neurochemical reinforcement and cognitive-motivational channeling. At every level, most of the evidence concerns how relationships form, not how they last. The open questions are which dimension of similarity matters, at which relationship stage, and through which pathway.
// Source
Authors: Denis O. Drobyshev