The Ominous Triangle of Ignorance: Proposing a Three-Axis Analytical Framework in Ignorance Studies
Abstract
Three categories of false belief, namely superstitious or paranormal belief, pseudoscience, and vacuous pseudo-philosophical nonsense, have not previously been treated as a single, named analytical unit in the ignorance studies literature. This paper attempts to fill that gap by introducing and provisionally testing the concept of the "ominous triangle of ignorance", a term the author previously used in a narrative context based on personal observation. Here the concept rests on empirical, peer-reviewed evidence. The paper examines three main questions: first, whether the three vertices correlate, at the level of individual differences, through a shared cognitive mechanism (analytic-reflective thinking style); second, whether the prevalence of these beliefs in the population, as measured by long-running public surveys, has actually risen in the social media era, or whether only the opportunity to act on this shared vulnerability (visibility and content density) has increased; and third, whether documented evidence shows this vulnerability entering formal structures of power, or prevalence genuinely growing in a specific sub-domain. The findings show that all three vertices, though only partially, correlate with one another. Prevalence in two vertices (superstition and general pseudoscientific belief) has remained largely stable over two decades, while the density of related content has shown event-driven spikes. In one specific sub-domain, vaccine hesitancy, the paper presents a case documenting both influence on policy and formal power and a genuine rise in prevalence across society. The paper does not claim that the ominous triangle is the most important cause of ignorance today, nor that its three vertices form a fully coherent whole. It offers only preliminary evidence for proposing that these three vertices be studied together, as a three-axis analytical framework, within the ignorance studies literature.
// Source
Authors: Ramin Saadat
Institutions: Council for British Research in the Levant