Bipolaronic superconductivity in the TQNT chi field: self-consistent well, plasmonic omega_chi, and an intrinsically non-adiabatic mechanism

Abstract

ERRATUM (v2). This version withdraws two results of v1 and requalifies a third. (1) The mass threshold m_c ~ 1-10 m_e is withdrawn as stated: it was obtained with a boson of 30 meV — a phonon — whereas this letter advocates the plasmon; since alpha_F is proportional to sqrt(m*/omega), the same criterion at 4.55 eV gives m_c ~ 167 m_e. The two channels are now separated explicitly. (2) The values T_c = 56 K and 831 K are withdrawn: they were computed with mu* = 0.1, contradicting the letter's own assumption mu* ~ lambda_pl, and the Coulomb repulsion was counted twice. (3) The near-cancellation lambda_pl - mu* ~ 0 was presented as derived; it is an assumption, now labelled as such, and it is in tension with a later internal calculation giving mu ~ 7e-3. That arbitration is open and is the main thing this line of work owes the reader. All numerical inputs are now published, so every figure is reproducible from the text alone. Nothing is retracted from the construction itself. The Cooper pair is read as a two-component link of two trefoils: even braid parity gives an integer spin, hence a boson of charge 2e, and the quantised flux h/2e follows from single-valuedness of the condensate phase — the "2" of 2e is that of the two linked knots. The direct binding channels are eliminated with numbers (gravity 1e40 too weak, magnetic dipole 1e4 too weak, London null, Coulomb repulsive at +5.8 eV), and the binding is read as dynamical self-trapping in the shared chi well, whose collective mode is identified with the plasmon. This work should be read as an ontological proposal with a standard-physics engine, not as a competitor producing new numbers. Version 1 (10.5281/zenodo.20763513) remains citable. The concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20763512 always resolves to the latest version.