DC‑NO.EP V1 Second‑Order Metaphilosophy of Economics · Full Sealed Edition

Abstract

DC‑NO.EP V1 is the complete first edition of the second‑order metaphilosophy of economics, consisting of the core architecture framework and three volumes: P1 (Existence · Value · Exchange), P2 (Institutions · Methods · Time), and P3 (Ethics · Formalization · Schools), totaling 89 propositions. Taking "Measurement‑as‑Non‑Being" as its first meta‑axiom and proposing the ontological difference operator Δ, the system systematically reveals the ontological substitution effect of economic measurement: every measurement operation generates an ineliminable ontological residue, rather than a simple error or simplification. Starting from ontological foundations, the system extends layer by layer to institutional governance, methodological critique, philosophy of time, ethical norms, mathematical formalization, and school reassessment, constructing a complete chain of critique of "measurement violence" from ontology to governance and from theory to tools. The core content of the system is permanently sealed and abides by the principle of reflexivity; verification authority rests with external researchers, and the system does not claim ultimate truth on its own. The term "violence" as used in the DC‑NO.EP second‑order metaphilosophy of economics is strictly confined to the ontological philosophical level, denoting the structural closure effect imposed by measurement operations upon economic alterity, rather than any physical, institutional, or political violence. The system explicitly distinguishes three levels: ontological violence (the system's core usage), institutional violence (merely for differentiation), and physical violence (not used by the system). This usage is descriptive, aiming to reveal the mechanism by which the irreducible ontological residue Δ arises in economic measurement; it does not constitute a moral condemnation or political accusation against any particular state, political system, social group, or historical practice. The system's critique of "plan" and "market" is symmetrical, as both fall within the framework of "measurement‑alteration"; the system does not take sides with any political camp, and its ethical red line explicitly prohibits using this system for epistemic power suppression. The system itself is also subject to this critique — its own text is likewise a measurement operation that generates ontological residue. This abstract is intended to convey the precise academic meaning of the term to readers, avoiding any misinterpretation divorced from its philosophical context. Highest Evidentiary Layer (Zenodo): 10.5281/ZENODO.21982945