基于政治哲学圆融模型的近现代主流思想体系评估 ——一项基于双层分析框架的思想史元评判

Abstract

English Abstract:This paper employs the Political Philosophy Cohesion Model from the "Productive Political Philosophy" framework as an evaluative tool to systematically assess five major modern intellectual systems: Liberalism, Marxist Historical Materialism, New Institutional Economics, Postmodernism, and Modernization Theory. The assessment framework consists of two clearly distinguished layers. The first layer is the structural criteria of the Cohesion Model—the completeness of Value (V), Methodology (M), and Tool (T_tool), integrated with the Matrix Homogeneity coefficient (ρ)—which is a formally neutral functional analysis tool answering "whether the system structure is complete." The second layer is the functional criteria of Productive Political Philosophy—specifically, whether the system incentivizes exploration, expansion, and utilization of the material world as the standard for determining its synthesis mode—which is an explicit value position answering "whether the system incentivizes production." The former is a universal yardstick; the latter is the value coordinate against which the yardstick is applied. The paper analyzes each system's underlying axioms, structural completeness, synthesis mode, deficiency types, and completion ceilings, locating them on a spectrum of completeness. Its conclusion is open-ended: under structural criteria, all five systems exhibit incompleteness; under functional criteria, none of the five takes "incentivizing exploration, expansion, and utilization of the material world" as its supreme unifying principle—a structural void that stands as an open question left to intellectual history. Keywords:Political Philosophy Cohesion Model; Matrix Homogeneity; Structural Criteria; Functional Criteria; Synthesis Mode; Intellectual History Assessment; Completeness.