Physics & Spacepreprint2026-08-09

PAPER-FBT08D: Asymptotic Null-Shear Readout of the QGT Propagation Layer

Open access0 citations

Abstract

This paper develops an asymptotic boundary representation of the QGT propagation layer introduced in FBT08C. The main text of FBT08C defines a local pre-spacetime velocity ratio νQ(u, v) =|Ωread(u, v)| / √︁gread(u, u)√︁gread(v, v), which satisfies 0 ≤ νQ ≤ 1 on a K¨ahler-compatible QGT readout chart. After finite vacuum calibration, this gives veff = c∗νQ ≤ c∗. The present paper asks how this causal-readout layer may appear when the downstream Lorentzian readout admits a suitable future null boundary. The answer is conditional. FBT08D does not introduce null shear as a new primitive object of the FBT framework. Rather, it records a possible asymptotic boundary representation: (︁Mread4 ,Qread, c∗)︁---(︁PshearI+ ,ΩshearI+)︁, where the right-hand side is a boundary field space of null-cut and null-shear data. In this representation, a null-cut function Z(xa, ζ, ¯ζ) encodes cuts of future null infinity, while its angular second derivative σ = ð2Z records the shear deformation of the cut. The paper clarifies three structural interfaces. First, the balanced tension shell of FBT01D, CT + S2Morse = 0, is read as a local quadratic seed for a null-characteristic structure. After square-rooting and homogeneous null lifting, it gives a local null-cone generator rather than a shear field directly. The shear appears only as the angular deformation of the associated null-cut data. Second, the infinite relative thimble-depth limit is identified as the natural null-like boundary interface of the massive thimble sector: ΔD → ∞ =⇒ e−ΔD → 0, M0e−ΔD → 0. This is a zero-rest-mass boundary branch, not an absence of physical energy. The null-shear readout is then interpreted as the trace-free boundary deformation of this null-like interface. Third, the paper explains why possible nontrivial shear residue should not come from purely local Darboux data. Locally, Darboux coordinates make the symplectic structure standard. Nontrivial shear-type information can only arise from global organisation: holonomy, monodromy, Chern data, Darboux–Floer gluing, or thimble continuation. Thus the possible boundary shear is read as an asymptotic imprint of global dual-phase twisting after a stable four-dimensional carrier and Lorentzian causal readout have been selected. The updated version (v0.3) incorporates two upstream geometric bridges. FBT0E provides the Grassmannian embedding of the coherent-state carrier, anchoring the stable fourdimensional carrier and its null boundary in the Pl¨ucker/Schubert stratification of Gr(3, 6). FBT0D supplies the singular-fibre language in which the Darboux–Floer twisting that generates non-trivial shear can be understood as monodromy around degenerate fibres of the dual-phase torus. The resulting architecture places FBT08D between FBT08C, FBT15A, FBT22B, FBT23, FBT0C, and now FBT0E/FBT0D. It supplies a conditional null-boundary representation of finite QGT causal readout, clarifies the infinite-depth null interface, and organises the boundary shear layer as a downstream readout rather than a new primitive degree of freedom. The non-central SU(2) tension algebra supplies the local spherical screen SU(2)/U(1) ∼=S2 on which null directions and spin-weighted shear data may be represented. Exact SU(2) symmetry gives the zero-shear reference cut, while nontrivial shear arises only from global Darboux–Floer or thimble-induced deformations of the null-cut data.

// Source

View paper (DOI)Open access versionOpenAlexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Published 2026-08-09

Authors: ZHAI Xingyun