Physics & Spacepreprint2026-08-08

A causal variational worldline action for modified inertia: the rapidity gap

Open access0 citations

Abstract

Preprint. This deposit exists to timestamp a construction and to carry its reproducibility scripts; it is not a journal publication. The result, in one line. The object that supplies the proper-acceleration magnitude |a| to a worldline action, without the (v/c)2 suppression that kills the polynomial forms, is the rapidity gap between the four-velocities at two proper times: cosh θ = -u·u'/c2, with √(-u·u'/c2 - 1) = √2 sinh(θ/2) exactly and θ(s)/s → |a|/c as s → 0, because proper acceleration is the rate at which rapidity accumulates. A parity theorem first. Minkowski space admits exactly two invariant tensors, the metric (rank 2) and the Levi-Civita tensor (rank 4), both of EVEN rank. Every polynomial scalar built from four-velocities at any number of proper times therefore has even degree in u and, on a circular worldline, contributes only EVEN powers of the orbital speed — while the deep MOND limit needs the FIRST power, since |a| = γ2Ωv. So no polynomial-in-u worldline self-interaction, at any degree, can produce MOND: the mismatch is exactly one power of v, i.e. (c/v)2 = 106-3.6×107 in amplitude at galactic speeds. The rapidity gap escapes because it is non-analytic in the bilinear, not because it is of higher degree. The model is then solved. With the minimal causal kernel K(s) = (N/λ)e-s/λ, supported on s > 0 only, the circular-orbit content reduces in closed form to Θ = (4Nv/c) x coth(π/x)/(4+x2) with x = λΩ (verified against quadrature to 20 digits). Setting the kernel's first moment to M1 = c/a0 makes Θ = |a|/a0 exactly in the short-memory regime, and the circular-orbit equation of motion becomes gbar = μ(gobs/a0) gobs — Milgrom's modified-inertia relation exactly. Demanding the interpolation exponent that solar-system ephemerides require (α ≥ 1.4; α = 1 is excluded by ~103) gives μ in closed form. The construction is causal by fiat, variational in the in-in sense, contains no derivative of x beyond the first so carries NO Ostrogradsky instability, and is Lorentz-invariant up to the preferred frame that modified inertia already presupposes. The speed-dependent long-memory branch is excluded STRUCTURALLY: a kinetic function of speed alone forces f'(v) = v3/(r a0), which is r-dependent, so no such function exists. A defect is identified and repaired. In a single-factor worldline action the same function multiplies the rest energy and the inertia, so the deep-MOND requirement μ → 0 forces the rest energy to VANISH at zero acceleration. This is shown to be structural: every ∫dτ W(Θ) term locks the two at a ratio independent of W. The repair uses the preferred-frame four-velocity in two variants, both giving rest energy exactly mc2 and inertia exactly mμ, with explicitly different costs: the CPT-even quadratic form has an energy that turns negative above v2 = 2c2/(3-μ), i.e. 0.8165c in the deep limit (a factor 240 above the fastest systems MOND is applied to, so a relativistic defect and not a galactic one); the linear form is bounded below at every speed but is CPT-odd and owes a Standard-Model-Extension analysis that is NOT attempted here. One falsifiable prediction. The preferred-frame coupling in either form is |B| = (1-μ)/2 ≈ a02/8g2, so any Lorentz violation from this construction scales as g-2 with the local gravitational acceleration: ~1.1×10-23 in a terrestrial laboratory, 3.1×10-17 at Earth's orbital acceleration, and of order unity only in the outer disc of a galaxy. This is the OPPOSITE of a constant SME background — largest where no test exists, smallest where tests are tightest. Binning Lorentz-violation limits by local g would test it. It is not confronted with data here. WHAT IS NOT CLAIMED, stated up front because it bounds the result. The acceleration scale is NOT derived. The kernel's first moment must satisfy M1 = c/a0, and in the short-memory limit ONLY that moment survives — verified across three kernel shapes (exponential, gamma-2, box) normalised to the same moment. One number is traded for one number. The coefficient relating a0 to Λ remains fitted, not derived. The interpolating kernel ν = √(1+1/y) is identical to Eq. (9) of Milgrom, Phys. Lett. A 253, 273 (1999) — not a variant of it. That paper obtains it from a de Sitter-Unruh temperature balance and fixes a0 = 2cHΛ. Nothing in the kernel is new here; what is new is the ACTION and the parity theorem that identifies which structure can produce it. A NEW constant is introduced: the kernel memory time λ, bounded hard by the requirement that the short-memory regime hold at Mercury, λ ≤ 1.4 days, hence kernel weight N ≥ 2.6×1013. A galaxy-scale λ is excluded outright. Non-circular orbits are NOT solved; the reduction holds |a| constant. The |s| non-analyticity means the action admits no local derivative expansion, so there is no effective-field-theory power counting and no controlled quantum completion by that route. No claim is made regarding particle physics, the Standard Model, or unification. The author publicly withdrew earlier statements of that kind and does not restate them. AI-assistance disclosure. Portions of the analysis, numerical verification and drafting were carried out with the assistance of a large language model (Anthropic Claude). The author directed the work, specified and reviewed every load-bearing calculation, and takes full responsibility including for any errors. No AI system satisfies the criteria for authorship and none is listed as an author. Several intermediate claims produced during the work were found to be incorrect and were withdrawn before this deposit. Reproducibility. Every quantitative claim is produced by a committed script that exits with a nonzero status if any internal consistency check fails, and each carries negative controls that must trip. The six scripts are included in this deposit (30/30, 35/35, 35/35, 38/38, 50/50 and 14/14 checks).

// Source

View paper (DOI)Open access versionOpenAlexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Published 2026-08-08

Authors: Carl P. Zimmerman

Institutions: Ad-Tech (United States)