On Formation

Abstract

On Formation Abstract The content of this work is Conflicts with Georges Lemaître and Edwin Hubble's "Big Bang Theory" (accidental explosion and expansion from Nothingness) Under the condition of Nothingness alone, chance cannot operate (events or accidents cannot occur). Furthermore, to postulate 'Absolute Nothingness', the Maintenance of the Nothingness State must also be postulated. Therefore, Absolute Nothingness, devoid even of Maintenance, cannot exist in reality. Conflicts with Isaac Newton's "Classical Mechanics & Particle Physics" (the existence of matter (particles) as the premise of force) Maintenance also belongs to Transition (→) [Pressure (P)]. Space is formed through the Accumulation of Transition, and matter (particles) belongs to Space. Therefore, Force precedes Space, and Space precedes Matter (Particles). Conflicts with Galileo Galilei and Isaac Newton's "First Law of Motion" (perpetual linear motion in space without external force) — Since Maintenance also belongs to Transition — everything (every place) is at all times undergoing Transition [Force is acting (Action)]. Therefore, Absolute Empty-space does not exist in reality. And all Motion is guided to where Resistance (R) is lowest (perpetuates) (Motion ∝ -𝛁R). Conflicts with Isaac Newton's "Principia" (F=ma, invariant property inherent to matter proportional to acceleration) 'It hurts more to be hit by something heavier.', 'Weight changes when moving on a scale'... Mass is not an inherent property. Force is Pressure and Density. When an amount of Force is added to matter (Force), the Direction that Force is heading is guided to where Resistance is lowest (perpetuates) (v ≡ Impulse(I) ∝ |-𝛁R| ⇔ |-𝛁𝛒|). Conflicts with Isaac Newton's "Third Law of Motion" (instantaneous and absolute symmetry of action and reaction) As long as an Object possesses Volume, its Inward Surface Area is structurally, naturally larger than its Outward Area. Furthermore, maintaining existence also possesses a Minimum Interval (𝛅_min), so Action and Reaction cannot be instantaneous (absolutely simultaneous). Therefore, Action and Reaction cannot form absolute symmetry in magnitude (?) or occur absolutely simultaneously. Conflicts with Pierre-Simon Laplace's "Laplace's Demon / Classical Determinism" (the precedence of data simultaneous with phenomena and capable of predicting the future) Regarding a State where '0' is repeatedly added: if one perceives '0+0+0+0' and derives the value '0+0+0+0=0', the State at that moment would be closer to '0+0+0+0+0' than '0+0+0+0=0'. Even if the future were determined, that future can never be absolutely identical to any past that existed before; accordingly, that future cannot be predicted 'under absolutely identical conditions'. Therefore, Information or Data cannot be absolutely simultaneous with Actuality; while predicting the future can be attempted, an image absolutely matching the future cannot be derived. Conflicts with Albert Einstein's "General Relativity" (a completed geometric Field where events occur) "The Universe is a dynamic construction site of self-formation where mediums push, flow, and squeeze without a fixed stand." (by Gemini) Conflicts with Albert Einstein's "Special Relativity" (absolute constant c invariant everywhere in the universe) Light also changes velocity (v) relative to gravitational fields or atmospheres. Rather than saying time slowed down or sped up, the speed of light (c) is not an Absolute Constant (c ≡ v ∝ |-𝛁R| ⇔ |-𝛁𝛒|). Furthermore — including the above content — it conflicts with various traditional perspectives, and describes that "the Universe is the feedback between Non-fixed State and Quasi-fixed State, a perpetuity of this fractal." [Open Verification Channel]https://notebook.google.com/notebook/7b81bf2d-4bb8-44d2-99c7-34256edcc281?utm_source=gemini_notebook&utm_medium=referral&pli=1