Author
R ANANDHAN
Recent research
- Society & EconomicsOpen access
The administrative and academic classification of the Baḍugu language mass has historically suffered from a profound flatland bias, frequently mischaracterizing it as a shallow, corrupted medieval offshoot of flatland Kannada that ascended the Nilgiri Massif post-1565 CE [Anandha...
- Society & EconomicsOpen access
Traditional colonial and post-colonial anthropological frameworks have long suffered from a structural binary when evaluating the indigenous speech communities of the Nilgiri Massif. While small pastoral and artisanal groups were classicized as "insular, isolated tribes," the num...
- Climate & EnvironmentOpen access
Traditional colonial and post-colonial cartographic practices have systematically obscured the deep-time indigeneity of the numerical majority of the Nilgiri Massif—the Baḍuga community—by categorizing their language and presence as a shallow, 16th-century medieval Kannada refuge...
- Climate & EnvironmentOpen access
Traditional colonial and post-colonial cartographic practices have systematically obscured the deep-time indigeneity of the numerical majority of the Nilgiri Massif—the Baḍuga community—by categorizing their language and presence as a shallow, 16th-century medieval Kannada refuge...
- Physics & SpaceOpen access
For over a century, South Dravidian comparative philology and Nilgiri ethnography have operated under a profound structural paradigm gap introduced by the foundational models of Murray B. Emeneau and Thomas Burrow (1984) [Burrow & Emeneau, 1984]. This conventional framework local...
- Society & EconomicsOpen access
For over a century, ethnographic paradigms tracking the Nilgiri Massif have localized prehistoric high-altitude animism and sacred ritual networks almost exclusively within the Toda (Tōtst) community, while positioning the Baḍuga (Baḍugu) majority within an imported, post-1565 CE...
- Society & EconomicsOpen access
For over a century, the dominant paradigm in Nilgiri historical linguistics and ethnography—largely codified by Murray B. Emeneau and Thomas Burrow—has localized prehistoric pastoral institutions exclusively within the Toda (Tōtst) community, while characterizing the Baḍuga major...
- Society & EconomicsOpen access
For over a century, the dominant paradigm in Nilgiri historical linguistics and ethnography—largely codified by Murray B. Emeneau and Thomas Burrow—has localized prehistoric pastoral institutions exclusively within the Toda (Tōtst) community, while characterizing the Baḍuga major...
- Society & EconomicsOpen access
For more than a century, mainstream Dravidian comparative philology has operated under a restrictive, plains-centric model that miscategorises Baḍugu as a modern, post-medieval dialect or a subordinate offshoot of Kannada or Tamil. This paper fundamentally deconstructs that assum...
- Society & EconomicsOpen access
For more than a century, mainstream Dravidian comparative philology has operated under a restrictive, plains-centric model that miscategorises Baḍugu as a modern, post-medieval dialect or a subordinate offshoot of Kannada or Tamil. This paper fundamentally deconstructs that assum...