Researchers compared the publicly available governance documents of six summer Olympic international sports federations with standards from five United Nations anti-corruption guidance documents. The federations represented different governance tiers and were based in Switzerland, Germany, Britain and Malaysia, all jurisdictions covered by the UN anti-corruption framework used in the study.

Using a 41-question scoring tool, the study examined leadership commitment, risk assessment, prohibited conduct, financial integrity, conflicts of interest, reporting systems, training and enforcement. The federations generally showed policy-level commitments, but their documents were weaker on how those commitments would operate and be overseen.