A systematic review maps fungal, viral, and other forest pathogens and finds early-warning DNA methods are advancing faster than real-world management.
The review examined 142 peer-reviewed studies on forest pathogen biology, how outbreaks spread, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies. Fungal pathogens made up the largest share of the research, but oomycetes and nematodes were also strongly represented.
Across pathogen groups, the authors report evidence that drought stress and temperature-driven range shifts can increase pathogen pressure. They also describe how molecular diagnostics—such as environmental DNA monitoring, DNA amplification tests, and metagenomic sequencing—have moved detection toward earlier, landscape-scale warning. However, the authors find an evidence-to-practice gap remains in how these tools are used within integrated forest management.
Cross-kingdom disease patterns and tools
The authors synthesized 142 peer-reviewed studies (assessed for methodological quality using the ROBINS-I tool). Fungal pathogens accounted for 80 studies (~56.3%), while oomycetes accounted for 27 (~19.0%) and nematodes for 31 (~21.8%). Research coverage was biased toward Europe and East Asia, leaving tropical plantation pathosystems under-represented. Climate change was identified as a pervasive modifier of pathogen pressure, with documentation of drought-induced stress and temperature-driven range expansions across all four pathogen groups. The review reports that molecular diagnostics—including environmental DNA surveillance, Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP), and high-throughput sequencing metagenomics—have enabled a shift from symptom-based detection to prospective early warning. The review also proposes a Pathogen Pressure Index (PPI) framework to link drivers, pathogens, and outcomes for research prioritization. It notes a near-absence of viral pathology research and that a key limitation across many studies was serious confounding in plantation and climate-change research.
// Source
Current Forestry Reports · 2026 · DOI: 10.1007/s40725-026-00285-9
Authors: Gabriel Osei Forkuo, Stelian Alexandru Borz
Institutions: Transylvania University of Brașov