A survey of 182 people in flood-prone parts of Maryland and Virginia found that relocation decisions involved practical, social and political concerns as well as flood risk.
Researchers surveyed residents of high-risk coastal areas on Maryland’s Delmarva Peninsula and in Hampton Roads, Virginia, about flood experiences, relocation plans and preferred destinations. Disastrous hurricane flooding, higher taxes, living costs and insurance rates were the most highly rated reasons to leave; low crime and access to family, friends and healthcare were prominent reasons to choose another place.
Respondents also rated relocation assistance as important. They favored programs that are transparent and straightforward, tailored to individual needs, open to public participation and able to provide financial compensation, moving help, and free legal or technical advice.
What shapes the decision to move
More than half of respondents, 54%, said they would not relocate. Another 22% said they would relocate now, and 24% said they would do so in the future. Most respondents had experienced storm-surge flooding, high tides or heavy rain, but reported flood exposure alone did not consistently predict willingness to move. Among the exposure measures examined, vehicle damage was the only one with a statistically significant relationship to relocation willingness.
The strongest stated reasons for leaving were disastrous hurricane flooding and financial pressures, including higher taxes, living costs and insurance rates. People were most attracted to destinations with low crime and closer access to family, friends and healthcare. The regression analysis identified nine predictors of relocation willingness. These included five flood-related or quality-of-life pressures, changes in social support, a preference for living outside the FEMA floodplain, proximity to friends, access to free legal and technical advice, and a preference for communities with conservative policies. These are predictors in the survey analysis, not evidence that any one factor causes people to move.
Why relocation programs need more
The findings suggest that coastal buyout and relocation programs may be less likely to meet residents’ needs if they focus only on flood exposure or property payments. The survey points to a broader set of concerns, including insurance and living costs, disrupted services, social ties, destination safety and access to professional advice. The results can help inform relocation policy, models of coastal movement and programs that coordinate household needs with wider land-use planning.
Evidence and limits
The study used a telephone survey with 182 completed responses from high-risk coastal settings on Maryland’s Delmarva Peninsula and in Hampton Roads, Virginia. It combined respondents’ reports of past flooding, relocation intentions, preferred destinations and socioeconomic characteristics with a regression analysis of relocation predictors.
The study measured willingness or intention to relocate, not confirmed future moves. The sample was relatively homogeneous: 51% of respondents were over 60, 88% were White, 61% had a bachelor’s degree, and 89% owned their homes. The authors note that these characteristics are less representative of the more diverse Hampton Roads population, limiting how broadly the findings can be applied. The survey’s observational design also identifies relationships among reported factors rather than proving that they cause relocation.
// Source
Population and Environment · 2026 · DOI: 10.1007/s11111-026-00541-x
Authors: Anamaria Bukvic, Mingang Kim
Institutions: Virginia Tech